Pengembangan Model dan Simulasi Berbasis Agen untuk Adopsi Layanan Bank Sampah di Kota Semarang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36722/sst.v5i3.371Abstract
Abstrak - Pemerintah Kota Semarang melakukan pembentukan bank sampah untuk menekan jumlah sampah di tempat pembuangan akhir. Masih bayak masyarakat di Kota Semarang yang belum mengikuti program tersebut. Pada penelitian ini dilakukan pemodelan untuk meningkatkan partisipasi masyarakat dalam mengelola sampah. Keikutsertaan masyarakat dipengaruhi oleh beberapa faktor yaitu intention, sosial norm, jarak menuju recyclingsiteagent dan outcome. Intention seseorang dalam melakukan pengelolaan sampah secara signifikan dipengaruhi oleh awareness of consequences, ascription of responsibility dan personal norm. Pemodelan dan skenario menggunakan metode agent based modeling, menghasilkan usulan kebijakan yaitu dengan mendirikan empat bank sampah. Melalui keputusan tersebut mampu menghasilkan 93% partisipasi rumah tangga dalam mengelola sampah dan 2,4 ton sampah yang dikumpulkan hingga periode ke 60 minggu.
Abstract - Semarang government has established a Waste Bank to reduce the amount of waste in landfills. There are still many people in Semarang who have not participated in this program. This research modeling aims to increase public participation in managing waste. Public participation is influenced by intention, social norm, and distance to recycling site agents as well as the outcome. An intention to of managing waste is significantly influenced by awareness of consequences, the ascription of responsibility and personal norm. In this study using agent-based modeling. The results obtained from this model and scenarios are the intervention to establishing four Waste Bank. It produced 93% of households participating in managing waste and 2.4 tons of garbage collected in the 60 weeks.
Keywords – Agent-based modeling, Norm Activation Model, Waste Separation Behavior, Bank Sampah,ÂReferences
. E. Y. Fajlin, “Produksi sampah kota semarang 1.200 ton per hari, 46 hektar TPA Jatibarang bakal penuhâ€, Tribunjateng.com, 2019. (online accessed 18 November 2019)
. B. Zhang, K. Lai, B. Wang, Z. Wang, “From intention to action: How do personal attitudes, facilities accessibility, and government stimulus matter for household waste sorting?â€, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 233, pp. 447-458, 2019.
. R. Wall, D. P. Wright, A. G. Mill, “Comparing and combining theories to explain proenvironmental intentionsâ€, environment and behavior, vol. 39(6), pp. 731-753, 2007.
. I. Ajzen, “Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behaviorâ€, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, vol. 32, pp. 665-683,2002.
. R. D. Astuti, U. Linarti, “Analisis pengaruh faktor dalam TPB dan outcome terhadap niat warga bergabung di bank sampah (Studi kasus di kota Yogyakarta)â€, Seminar Nasional Teknologi Terapan 2018 (SNTT), Yogyakarta,2018.
. M. F. Sorkun, “How do social norms influence recycling behavior in collectivistic society? A case study from Turkeyâ€, Waste Management, vol. 80, pp. 359 – 370, 2018.
. J. Sotamenou, S. D. Jaeger, S. Rousseau, “Drivers of legal and illegal solid waste disposal in the Global South - The case of households in Yaoundé (Cameroon)â€, Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 240, pp. 321-330, 2019.
. M. Luo, X. Song, S. Hu, Chen, D., “Towards the sustainable development of waste household appliance recovery systems in china : an agent-based modeling approachâ€, Journal of cleaner production, vol. 220, pp. 431-444, 2019.
. R. Axelrod, L.Testation, “A Guide For Newcomers to Agent Based Modeling in The Social Sciences, Kenneth L. Judd and Leigh Testation (eds.)â€, Handbook of Computational Economics, vol. 2, 2006.
. X.Meng, Z. Wen, Y. Qian, “Multi-agent based simulation for household solid waste recyclingbehaviorâ€,Resource, conservation and recycling, vol. 128, pp. 535-545, 2018.
. L. Xu, M. Ling, Y. Wu, “Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention studyâ€, Waste Management, vol. 77, pp. 522-531, 2018.